MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315969727 · doi:10.1021/ef1004573

Influence of Water Vapor on the Direct Sulfation of Limestone under Simulated Oxy-fuel Fluidized-Bed Combustion (FBC) Conditions

2011· article· en· W2315969727 on OpenAlex
Chunbo Wang, Lufei Jia, Yewen Tan, Edward J. Anthony

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfationCombustionFlue gasFluidized bed combustionFlue-gas desulfurizationSulfur dioxideChemistryOxy-fuelThermogravimetric analysisEnvironmental chemistrySulfurWater vaporMineralogyChemical engineeringWaste managementInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxy-fuel combustion of fossil fuel is one of the most promising methods for producing electricity, together with a stream of concentrated CO 2 ready for sequestration. Oxy-fuel fluidized-bed combustion (FBC) can also use limestone as a sorbent for in situ capture of sulfur dioxide. However, although a limited number of studies have been performed on sulfation of limestone under oxy-fuel combustion conditions, there are still a number of important but unanswered questions. Here, the effect of water vapor on the sulfation of limestone was studied, because it has not been examined in detail in previous sulfation studies and past studies on direct sulfation of limestone in FBC either did not explore the influence of H 2 O or did so under unrealistic conditions for oxy-fuel FBC. The purpose of this study is to identify the effect of water vapor on direct sulfation of limestone under simulated oxy-fuel circulating FBC (CFBC) conditions. Direct sulfation of three limestones was conducted in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) apparatus at 800 and 850 °C. The limestone particle sizes used were 75−125, 125−150, 150−250, and 250−425 μm, and tests were carried out in a synthetic flue gas atmosphere, consisting of 80% CO 2, 15%, 10% or 0% H 2 O, 4% O 2, 5000 ppm SO 2, and balance N 2 . Water always improved limestone sulfation, especially at 850 °C. In addition, for some limestones, such as Kelly Rock (Nova Scotia, Canada), when the reaction gas contained no H 2 O, the calcium conversion ratio was higher at 800 °C than at 850 °C. However, when the reaction gas contained 10% H 2 O, the conversion ratio and the sulfation reaction rate were always higher at 850 °C than at 800 °C. Because coal-fired boiler flue gases always contain water vapor, the role played by H 2 O in the limestone sulfation reaction should always be considered in future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it