Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabalho apresenta minha pesquisa poetica sobre um Diario de uma viagem (re)inventada , que tem por objetivo recriar uma viagem a partir das narrativas de audio de pessoas que moram em outros paises. Este diario de curiosidades teve inicio nos encontros promovidos pela Igreja Catolica Apostolica Romana, proporcionando contatos e trocas de experiencias. As pessoas originarias de paises como Alemanha, Argentina, Canada, China, Filipinas, Holanda, Mexico, Peru, Portugal, Singapura, Uganda, Uruguai e Venezuela gravaram narrativas sobre suas culturas, economias, religioes e geografias, permitindo que eu me apropriasse de suas falas para criar uma viagem, permeada de colecoes. A reuniao de elementos naturais, artefatos e fotografias fazem parte de uma viagem reinventada, resultando em uma exposicao destas colecoes particulares. O trabalho traca ainda um mapeamento de artistas contemporâneos que configuram em suas obras colecoes, museus e mapas afetivos. A pesquisa tambem apresenta uma relacao com a literatura e a narrativa sobrepondo nocoes de realidade e ficcao.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.018 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".