MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316006617 · doi:10.1386/ac.13.1.87_7

Refugees in Love and Life: An Interview with Majid Majidi

2002· article· en· W2316006617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gönül Dönmez‐Colin

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Cinema · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTurkey's Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeavenAmateurMovie theaterParadiseFilm directorArtFilm festivalHistoryArt historyMedia studiesSociologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Majid Majidi, one of the distinguished names of new Iranian cinema started as an actor in amateur theatre groups and got roles in films after the Islamic revolution. His debut as a director and screenwriter) was with Baduk 1991), a feature film that was presented at the Directors' Fortnight of Cannes Film Festival 1992, which also won him several national awards. His second film, Pedar The Father) (1996) received the Jury Award of San Sebastian Film Festival. He won the Grand Prix of the Americas of the Montreal World Film Festival three times in five years. The first was with Bacheha-ye aseman (Children Of Heaven) in 1997; the second was with Rang-e-Khoda (The Color of Paradise) in 1999, and the third, in 2001, with Baran, which shared the top prize with Torzok (Abandoned) by Hungarian Arpad Sopsits. Having won several awards at its own country as well, Baran has become one of the most successful films of the year, having gained a special meaning after the September 11 events in New York.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0320.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0050.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian CinemaSame topicTurkey's Politics and SocietyFrench-language works237,207