MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2316043263 · doi:10.1190/1.2370040

Seismic depth imaging with the Gabor transform

2006· article· en· W2316043263 on OpenAlexaff
Yongwang Ma, Gary F. Margravé

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGabor transformGeologyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Time–frequency analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wavefield extrapolation by spatially variable phase shift is currently a migration tool of importance. In this paper, we present a new prestack seismic migration algorithm using the Gabor transform with application to the Marmousi acoustic dataset. The imaging results show a very promising depth imaging algorithm, which is competitive with the best depth imaging algorithms. The Gabor depth imaging algorithm approximates generalized phase shift plus interpolation (GPSPI) wavefield extrapolation using the Gabor, or windowed Fourier, transform to localize the wavefield. The key to an efficient algorithm is to develop an adaptive windowing scheme that only localizes the wavefield as required by the lateral velocity variation. If there is no lateral velocity variation then no localization (windowing) is required. When velocity varies rapidly, then many, relatively narrow, windows are required for accurate wavefield extrapolation. We present the details of an adaptive windowing method that has a controlled phase error. Programs have been coded with the adaptive windowing algorithm, which substantially reduces the computational burden in wavefield extrapolation when compared to the full GPSPI integral. We will illustrate the performance of this algorithm with images from prestack depth migration of the Marmousi dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→