Spirometry and Obstructive Lung Disease in Manitoba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spirometry, the measurement of forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity, is recommended in the diagnosis and management of the obstructive lung diseases asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present report describes spirometry use in Manitoba and tests the hypothesis that regional spirometry use correlates with the prevalence of physician-diagnosed obstructive lung diseases. METHODS: Spirometry is renumerated on a fee-for-service basis by Manitoba Health. Like other physician services, billing data include a diagnosis, patient identifiers, as well as the patient's sex, date of birth and residential postal code. Physician billings for spirometry for 1991 to 1998 were analyzed, comparing data with billings for physician visits for obstructive diseases. Four age groups were examined, as were income quintiles in Winnipeg, Manitoba. In addition, the prevalence of physician-diagnosed obstructive diseases were compared with spirometry rates in 49 service use areas of the province. RESULTS: Annually, about 3% of the Manitoba population underwent spirometry, and in aggregate, about 14% underwent spirometry during the eight years of the study. Rates in Winnipeg were higher than in the remainder of the province. Spirometry rates did not increase with time, and people who underwent spirometry had 1.4 to 1.7 tests/year. In children, higher income quintiles were tested more than lower income quintiles, while in adults, income quintiles were tested with equal frequency. People with obstructive lung disease accounted for about 75% of those tested, and in people with these diagnoses, the likelihood of testing increased approximately linearly with the number of physician visits for asthma or COPD. Children with asthma were tested less often than adults, and adults with asthma or both asthma and COPD were tested more often than those with COPD alone. In adults with asthma or asthma and COPD who had more than 10 physician visits for these diagnoses, testing rates were more than 70%, and multiple tests were common. In patients labelled with COPD only and with more than 20 physician visits, about one-third did not undergo spirometry. In children aged five to 14 years and in adults 15 to 44 years old, regional spirometry rates correlated well with regional asthma rates. Regional spirometry rates also correlated significantly with regional rates of asthma and/or COPD in people older than 34 years old. INTERPRETATION: Spirometry use is considerably higher in patients with asthma than in patients with COPD, suggesting that guidelines are followed more closely in patients with asthma, and that many patients are labelled with COPD without appropriate documentation. Spirometry use is apparently indicative of physician interest in the problem of obstructive lung diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".