MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316252734 · doi:10.3749/canmin.50.4.805

Billwiseite, Ideally Sb3+5(Nb,Ta)3WO18, A New Oxide Mineral Species from the Stak Nala Pegmatite, Nanga Parbat - Haramosh Massif, Pakistan: Description and Crystal Structure

2012· article· en· W2316252734 on OpenAlexaffvenue
F. C. Hawthorne, Mark A. Cooper, N. A. Ball, Y. A. Abdu, P. Černý, Fernando Cámara, Brendan M. Laurs

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPegmatiteMassifMineralGeochemistryGeologyColumbiteMaterials scienceMetallurgyCeramic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Billwiseite, ideally Sb 3+ 5 (Nb,Ta) 3 WO 18 , is an oxide mineral from a granitic pegmatite on the eastern margin of the Nanga Parbat – Haramosh massif at Stak Nala, 70 km east of Gilgit, Pakistan. It is transparent, pale yellow (with a tinge of green), has a colorless to very pale-yellow streak, a vitreous luster, and is inert to ultraviolet radiation. Crystals are euhedral with a maximum size of ∽ 0.5 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm and show the following forms: {100} pinacoid ≈ {011} pinacoid ≈ {410} prism; contact twins on (100) are common. Cleavage is {100} indistinct, Mohs hardness is 5, and billwiseite is brittle with a hackly fracture. The calculated density is 6.330 g/cm 3 . The indices of refraction were not measured; the calculated index of refraction is 2.3, 2 V ( obs ) = 76(2)°. Billwiseite is colorless in transmitted light, non-pleochroic, and the optic orientation is as follows: X ‖ b , Y ^ c = 72.8° (in β acute). It occurs scattered across the surface of a large (∽5 × 2.5 × 1.3 cm) crystal of lepidolite from a miarolitic cavity. The most abundant minerals in the cavities at Stak Nala are albite, quartz, K-feldspar, tourmaline, muscovite or lepidolite, topaz and fluorite, and billwiseite can be partly mantled by B-rich muscovite. Billwiseite is monoclinic, space group C 2/ c , a 54.116(5), b 49143(5), c 5.5482(5) A, β 90.425(2)°, V 1475.5(2) A 3 , Z = 4, a:b:c = 11.012 : 1 : 1.131. The strongest seven lines in the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern [ d in A( I ) hkl ] are as follows: 3.147(100)(911, 911), 3.500(55) (511, 511), 1.662(53)(1422), 3.017(48)(1800), 1.906(47)(1820), 1.735(30)(113, 113), 1.762(25)(2711, 2711). Chemical analysis by electron microprobe gave Nb 2 O 5 12.03, Ta 2 O 5 19.31, Sb 2 O 3 48.34, TiO 2 0.99, WO 3 19.96, sum 100.63 wt.% where the valence state of Sb was determined by crystal-structure analysis. The resulting empirical formula on the basis of 18 O anions is Sb 3+ 4.87 (Nb 1.33 Ta 1.28 Ti 0.18 W 1.26 ) Σ4.05 O 18 . The crystal structure of billwiseite was solved by direct methods and refined to an R 1 index of 4.71% based on 2122 observed reflections collected on a three-circle diffractometer with Mo K α X-radiation. The structure consists of two distinct sheets of M (= Ta,Nb,W) octahedra and three distinct sheets of Sb 3+ polyhedra parallel to (100). These sheets alternate in the a direction to form a continuous structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207