MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316255109 · doi:10.1541/ieejias.134.332

Infant Monitoring System using Activity Recognition

2014· article· en· W2316255109 on OpenAlex
Jun Goto, Takuya Kidokoro, Tomohiro Ogura, Satoshi Suzuki

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsAlpha Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActivity recognitionFeature (linguistics)Computer scienceMedical careAccelerationPhysical activityPhysical medicine and rehabilitationArtificial intelligenceMedical emergencyPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An infant's unhealthy lifestyle increases the risk of adult diseases and the cost of medical care in their future. If the children's life-log is recorded and then their physical condition and transition of activities can be analyzed, it is expected that information can be utilized for the prevention of such issues and for promoting good health. Therefore, activity recognition for infants is discussed in this paper. Feature points are computed from accelerations measured using a 3-axis acceleration sensor attached to the infant's upper-arm, and then, a two-phased classification is performed. In addition, we developed an activity recognition system with database functions and real-time relearning for infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it