Variation in basal metabolic rate and activity in relation to reproductive condition and photoperiod in white-footed mice (<i>Peromyscus leucopus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A naturally variable life-history trait with underlying physiological variation is the photoperiodic response of many temperate-zone rodents, including white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus (Rafinesque, 1818)). Male P. leucopus were obtained from a short photoperiod responsive (R) line, artificially selected for reproductive suppression in short-day conditions (SD) and a nonresponsive (NR) line selected for reproductive maturity in SD. We tested for variation in metabolic rate between lines in SD and long-day conditions (LD). NR mice consumed 34% more food than R mice, without concomitant increase in body mass in SD. Basal metabolic rate (BMR) was found to be significantly greater in NR than R mice, and NR mice were found to engage in significantly more spontaneous (daily) locomotor activity. Energy-use estimates based on 24 h respirometry matched closely the level of intake reported for individual mice. The increased BMR and average daily metabolic rate in NR mice was correlated with testis size, but not with major central organs or digestibility. No significant difference in BMR or activity was found in mice from the same lines held in LD. Elevated intake in SD mice appears to be associated with differences in fertility and not other aspects of physiology in the respective lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".