Histopathogenesis of Non–HPV-related Differentiated Oral Squamous Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A study of immunohistopathologic and cytohistopathologic changes of the parabasal/basal layers in the differentiated squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (DSIN) may elucidate the histopathogenesis and reveal changes aiding early diagnosis and grading of the lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 55 consecutive resection specimens of nonbasaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the anterior oral cavity and 8 biopsies before resections displaying DSIN in the overlying squamous epithelium were examined. RESULTS: Squamous epithelium that is continuous/immediately adjacent to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (type 1) and the more peripheral (type 2) epithelium of resection specimens displayed consistent changes in the parabasal/basal layers: (A) cytologic atypia with proliferation of parabasal cells with downward expansion causing reactive proliferation of the basal cell layer in the early stage, invading the basal layer in the late stage; (B) disordered nuclear/cytoplasmic arrangement; (C) "Cobblestone" appearance. Immunoreactivity for TP53 and Ki67 was helpful in the diagnosis. The epithelial spectrum of changes decreased as one moved from type 1 to type 2 lesions. Five out of 8 biopsies showed type 1 lesions (followed by resection in a period of 11±6 mo) and 3 showed type 2 lesions (followed by resection in a period of 55±20 mo). In addition, resections were margin positive for type 2 lesions in 5 cases associated with recurrence at the site of resection during a period of 69±9 months. CONCLUSIONS: DSIN is characterized by a proliferation of neoplastic parabasal cells with dyskeratosis, downward expansion/pushing of the basal layer with elongation of rete ridges. We proposed grading of DSIN based on the changes of the parabasal/basal layers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".