MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2316422016

Abstract: A maritime perspective on Maine’s Gander Zone, including a few thoughts on tectonic-climate linkages

2007· article· en· W2316422016 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Douglas N. Reusch, Jason Choquette, Thomas G. Gregg, William P. O’Brien, Jessie Powers, Bryan S. Way

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOrogenyForearcOrdovicianPaleontologyDevonianOceanographyEarth scienceTectonicsSubduction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

s – GAC Newfoundland Section, 2007 Spring Technical Meeting Atlantic Geology, 2007, Volume 43, Number 1 Copyright © 2015 Atlantic Geology atlantic geology . volume 43 . 2007 82 Copyright © Atlantic Geology, 2007 Gander block (St. Croix) docked, causing proximal turbidite deposition (Vassalboro, southeastern margin of CM) and distal anoxia (Smalls Falls) in the former forearc. Slab break-off triggered minor within-plate volcanism. The Acadian foreland system, prominent in Maine, propagated northwestward following the docking of Avalon. Two examples from Maine illustrate how Appalachian tectonics may contribute to a general understanding of tectonicclimate linkages. First, Penobscot orogeny and the emergence of the New Caledonian ophiolite share much in common. The latter event coincided with the onset of Antarctic glaciation at 34 Ma. In both cases, the exhumation of soluble basic and ultrabasic rocks caused sequestering of atmospheric carbon dioxide through silicate weathering and organic carbon burial. For the 34 Ma event, a rapid trigger is needed to explain the climatic overshoot, and slab breakoff seems a plausible candidate. Second, near Farmington, a recently discovered slumped horizon rests directly on black shales, suggesting a methane release trigger for the slump. This relationship resembles the mechanism invoked for terminal Paleocene extinction, the best ancient analog for the worst-case future global warming scenario. Abstracts – GAC Newfoundland Section, 2007 Spring Technical Meetings – GAC Newfoundland Section, 2007 Spring Technical Meeting

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→