MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316432526 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2012-0554

Hydrogen transfer reactions in viscous media — Potential and free energy surfaces in solvent–solute coordinates and their kinetic implications

2013· article· en· W2316432526 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Heather Wiebe, Melissa Prachnau, Noham Weinberg

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser ValleySimon Fraser University
FundersWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsChemistryKinetic energyIsobutanePropaneSolventPentaneHydrogenThermodynamicsArrhenius equationHydrocarbonViscosityMethaneKineticsNeopentaneActivation energyPhysical chemistryChemical physicsOrganic chemistryMoleculeCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two-dimensional potential energy and free energy surfaces are obtained using quantum mechanical and molecular dynamics calculations for four hydrogen transfer reactions in n-hexane solvent: the methyl–methane, n-propyl–n-propane, n-pentyl–n-pentane, and t-butyl–isobutane systems. The resultant surfaces have similar landscapes despite the fact the equilibrated solvent cavities for these systems are notably different in size and shape. The kinetic implications of these landscapes are discussed. The Arrhenius and tunneling kinetics of hydrogen transfer in nonpolar hydrocarbon solute–solvent systems are not expected to show any significant viscosity dependence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207