MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2316464848 · doi:10.1190/segam2014-0346.1

A temporal trend in compliance measurements near a gas hydrate accumulation, Northern Cascadia

2014· article· en· W2316464848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lisa A. N. Roach, R. N. Edwards

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyClathrate hydrateSeismometerMicroseismSeismologySeabedOceanographySedimentGeomorphologyHydrate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocean gravity waves of typically kilometre scale, produce temporal pressure and correlated vertical displacements on the ocean floor. The experimental compliance is the ratio between the pressure and the resulting displacement. Pressures are measured by a differential pressure gauge (DPG), while a broadband seismometer measures velocities that are directly related to the displacements in frequency domain. These instruments are installed on NEPTUNE Canada's ocean floor network on the Cascadia margin. Here, gas hydrates occur and they have the property of stiffening marine sediment, i.e. reducing the compliance. A compliance measurement is dependent on the elastic parameters of the sediment, particularly the shear modulus. We computed compliance from raw data, daily, for 232 days and plotted the temporal variations in shear modulus of a region ~ 390 m North East of the undersea area known as Bullseye Vent. The compliance was determined over a bandwidth of 0.01 – 0.03 Hz, and has peak sensitivity to sediments between the ~200 and 400 mbsf, for water depth of 1250 m – determined by the gravity wave dispersion relation. We observed a linear decrease in compliance of ~1% between October, 2010 and May, 2011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→