MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

From Fat to Skin

2013· article· en· W2316538119 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia Chávez‐Muñoz, Khang T. Nguyen, Wei Xu, Seok-Jong Hong, Thomas A. Mustoe, Robert D. Galiano

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKeratinocyteStem cellInvolucrinCell biologyBiologyMesenchymal stem cellTransdifferentiationAdipose tissueTissue engineeringCell cultureEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The ideal aim of skin regeneration is to find a means to replace or regenerate this complex organ with normal appearance and with complete functionality. This process can be done in-vivo or in vitro and may require cells, natural or synthetic cell-supporting scaffold materials and bioactive molecules among other components. Unfortunately, current treatments are not capable of inducing permanent satisfying replacements.1–2 Human adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) have been shown to differentiate in-vitro into both mesenchymal lineages (adipogenesis, chondrogenesis, osteogenesis, fibroblasts) and non-mesenchymal lineages (endothelium, smooth muscle, cardiomyocytes, hepatocytes and neuron-like cells), confirming their transdifferentiation ability.3–5 This versatile differentiation potential and their easy availability, places adipose-derived stem cells at the advancing front of stem cell-based therapies. We hypothesized that ASC have the capacity to transdifferentiate into keratinocyte-like cells and furthermore be able to engineer a stratified epidermis. Methods and Results: ASC were successfully isolated from patients undergoing liposuction using Fluorescent-activated cell sorting technique (FACS). Pure populations of ASC were either co-cultured with human keratinocytes or with keratinocyte conditioned media. After a 14-day incubation period, ASC developed a polygonal cobblestone shape characteristic of human keratinocytes. Western blot and q-PCR analysis showed the presence of specific keratinocyte markers including Cytokeratin-5, Involucrin, Filaggrin and Stratifin in these keratinocyte-like cells (KLC); these markers were absent in undifferentiated ASC. To further evaluate if KLC were capable of stratification akin to human keratinocytes, ASC were seeded on top of human decellularized dermis and cultured in the presence of Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) and 1.8mM Ca2+ concentrations. Histological analysis demonstrated a stratified structure similar to that observed in normal skin. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis revealed the presence of keratinocyte markers such as Involucrin, Cytokeratin-5 and Cytokeratin-10. CONCLUSION: In conclusion this study demonstrates for the first time that ASC have the capacity to transdifferentiate into KLC and also to produce a stratified epidermis. This study suggests that adipose tissue is potentially a readily available and accessible source of keratinocyte-like cells, particularly for severe wounds encompassing large surface areas of the body and requiring prompt epithelialization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207