Stereoselective Syntheses of (+)-2-<i>epi</i>-Deoxoprosopinine, (−)-Deoxoprosophylline, (+)-<i>cis</i>-195A, and 2,5-Di-<i>epi</i>-<i>cis</i>-195A from a Common Chiral Nonracemic Building Block
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Approaches toward the syntheses of alkaloids belonging to the 2,6-disubstituted 3-hydroxypiperidine and cis-decahydroquinoline (cis-DHQ) classes of alkaloids are developed, starting from a common chiral nonracemic bicyclic lactam lactone (BLL). Two key δ-lactam intermediates, (5S,6S)-5-hydroxy-6-hydroxymethyl- and (5S,6S)-5-hydroxy-6-methylpiperidin-2-ones, are prepared; the latter δ-lactam is obtained via a direct decarbonylation of a bicyclic lactam lactol. The BLL is also used to prepare (4aR,5R,8aS)- and (4aR,5S,8aS)-5-methyloctahydroquinolin-2-ones, which involved a 6-exo-trig free-radical conjugate addition reaction. The stereoselectivity observed in the free-radical cyclization step is found to be governed by allylic 1,2-strain arising from the interaction of the N-(p-methoxybenzyl) group and the C6 substituent in the lactam ring of the free-radical intermediate. The effectiveness of the developed approaches is demonstrated by the asymmetric syntheses of (+)-2-epi-deoxoprosopinine, (-)-deoxoprosophylline, (+)-cis-195A, and 2,5-di-epi-cis-195A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".