Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation in Children With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of children undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) at the authors' institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 1999, 18 allogeneic bone marrow transplantations were performed in 17 patients with CML at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. Median age at diagnosis was 9.5 years (range 3-17). Fourteen patients had disease in the first chronic phase, one had disease in the second chronic phase, and two had disease in the accelerated phase. Preparative regimens varied, with radiation-based protocols used in eight patients. Thirteen donors were related (11 matched, 2 mismatched); four were unrelated (2 matched, 2 mismatched). Patients received T-cell-replete bone marrow a median of 7.5 months (range 2.2-22) from diagnosis. A median of 3.0 x 10(8)/kg nucleated cells was infused (range 1.6-6.7). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and methotrexate in 13 children. cyclosporine in three, and methotrexate in one. RESULTS: Primary graft failure occurred in one patient. Grade 2 acute GVHD or more developed in 11 of the 17 children (64%; grade 2 in 4, grade 3 in 7). Chronic GVHD occurred in 6 of the 16 patients at risk (37.5%; 5 extensive, 1 localized). No patient experienced overt or cytogenetic relapse. There were two deaths (12%): one from acute GVHD and cytomegalovirus pneumonia and the other from chronic GVHD. Probability of 5-year event-free survival was 87 +/- 9%. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly support the practice of allotransplantation in children with CML, even in the setting of advanced disease and histoincompatibility. Efforts should be aimed at reducing the transplantation-related death rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".