MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316656159 · doi:10.1021/jp503381r

Lipid-Modified Polyethylenimine-Mediated DNA Attraction Evaluated by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

2014· article· en· W2316656159 on OpenAlexafffund
Sampada Bagai, Chongbo Sun, Tian Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institutes of Natural SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesCompute Canada
KeywordsPolyethylenimineChemistryDNAMolecular dynamicsOleic acidUmbrella samplingChromatographyBiochemistryBiophysicsComputational chemistryBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of lipid modification on polyethylenimine (PEI)-mediated DNA attraction was studied by performing umbrella sampling molecular dynamics simulations that involved PEIs modified with three different types of lipids: oleic acid (OA), linoleic acid (LA), and caprylic acid (CA). The potential of mean force between two DNA molecules in the presence of these lipid-modified PEIs was calculated using the weighted histogram analysis method, and it predicted the stability and size of the DNA aggregate. When compared to native PEI, lipid modification was found to enhance the stability of DNA aggregation in the case of long lipids (LA and OA) but reduce the stability in the case of a short lipid (CA). In addition, LA-substituted PEI was shown to form stronger DNA aggregate than OA-substituted PEI, which correlates positively with previous experimental observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207