Rythmes sociaux et interférences temporelles - Exploration de séquences biographiques de calendriers et de récits
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social Rhythms and Temporal Interference – Exploring Biographical Sequences of Calendars and Stories: The life course and transitions are structured by institutional and cultural frames that contribute to regulate the trajectories. From three similar longitudinal survey panels which were conducted in France, Quebec and Argentina, we can articulate different kinds of temporal data concerning the paths young people follow as they are entering adulthood. Their careers were noted month by month on calendars, and in-depth interviews were used to record their stories. A quantitative exploration of the sequences allows to compare the situations, the events but also their temporal coincidences, while a qualitative analysis of the stories allow to understand their precise arrangements and to compare the conceptions of change in these three countries. We explore the heuristic potential of such mixed-methods design for both international comparison and precise interactions between events and decisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.091 | 0.093 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it