MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316684965 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2013.2296113

Antiislanding Protection Based on Signatures Extracted From the Instantaneous Apparent Power

2014· article· en· W2316684965 on OpenAlexaff
S. A. Saleh, A. S. Aljankawey, Ryan Meng, Julian Meng, Chris Diduch, Liuchen Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslandingTransient (computer programming)Instantaneous phaseControl theory (sociology)Power (physics)Signature (topology)Time–frequency analysisGenerator (circuit theory)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsDistributed generationElectrical engineeringMathematicsRenewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new passive antiislanding method for three-phase (3φ) distributed generation units (DGUs). The proposed method is based on extracting signatures from the instantaneous 3φ apparent powers determined at the point of common coupling (PCC). This new method is found on the fact that the instantaneous 3φ apparent powers have components continuously exchanged between loads and sources. The islanding condition creates transient high-frequency components in the instantaneous 3φ apparent powers.These high-frequency components contain signature information capable of identifying the islanding condition. These transient high-frequency components can be extracted using the wavelet packet transform (WPT), when applied to the direct and quadrature (d-q-axis) components of the instantaneous 3φ apparent powers. The d-q WPT-based antiislanding method is implemented for testing on a 3φ permanent magnet generator-based wind energy conversion system. Test results demonstrate an accurate, fast, and reliable response to the islanding condition occurring when supplying different load types at different levels of power delivery to the host grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207