MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316687586

Equipping primary care physicians for the digital age. The Internet, online education, handheld computers, and telemedicine.

2002· article· en· W2316687586 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas S. Nesbitt, Anthony Jerant, Thomas Balsbaugh

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility
Canadian institutionsCentre for Family Medicine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelemedicineThe InternetScope (computer science)Primary careMobile deviceMedicineQuality (philosophy)Health careInternet privacyMultimediaFamily medicineComputer scienceWorld Wide WebPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The knowledge needed to practice quality medicine has increased dramatically in the past 10 years and continues to do so exponentially. The number of new drugs is ever increasing, and the guidelines for screening and treating common diseases are constantly changing. For primary care physicians, who must maintain up-to-date knowledge of a broad scope of health conditions, the challenges are enormous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207