MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316725492 · doi:10.2514/6.2004-494

Numerical and Experimental PIV/PLIF Studies of Entropy Production in Natural Convection

2004· article· en· W2316725492 on OpenAlexaff
O. B. Adeyinka, G.F. Naterer

Bibliographic record

Venue42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntropy productionNatural convectionConvectionMechanicsEntropy (arrow of time)Computer scienceMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Local Entropy production rates are determined by a numerical and experimental study of natural convection in an enclosure. Numerical predictions are implemented by a control-volume-based finite element formulation for discrete equations arising from the conservation laws and the Second Law. The experimental procedure combines the methods of Particle Image Velocimetry and Planar Laser Induced Fluorescence for measured velocity and temperature fields in the enclosure. An entropy based conversion algorithm is validated by comparing the measured entropy production in a channel at ReD = 804 with the analytical result. The measured and analytical results closely agree with a maximum difference of 4.6% relative to the analytical values. Also, results are obtained for entropy production due to fluid friction for natural convection of water at a Rayleigh number of 5.35 × 10 and Prandtl Number of 8.06. The results provide new data for tracking spatial variation of friction irreversibility. Nomenclature cp, cv specific heats (J/kgK) k thermal conductivity (W/mK)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and ExhibitSame topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207