MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316751645 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.235127

Floquet-Bloch analysis of refracting Huygens metasurfaces

2014· article· en· W2316751645 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersLorry I. Lokey Interdisciplinary Center for Life Sciences and Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology
KeywordsFloquet theoryPhysicsOpticsAmplitudeModulation (music)AcousticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the response of passive lossless Huygens metasurfaces (HMS), designed to implement a prescribed refraction, to arbitrary plane-wave excitations. Applying a rigorous Floquet-Bloch (FB) analysis of the cotangent electric and magnetic surface reactance modulations, we discover that the scattered FB modes follow an extraordinary ray-optical model. According to this model, the HMS can be replaced by a virtual region of constant wave impedance; incident power is incoupled into this virtual Fabry-P\'erot etalon, gradually leaking to successively higher-order FB modes. Analytical closed-form expressions are derived for the FB coefficients, indicating that the first FB mode in transmission is always dominant; this clarifies previous experimental findings which implied that the HMS retained its functionality over a broad angular range. Furthermore, we point out the implementation problems inherent in the cotangent function and offer a simple, realizable form of the reactive modulation which does not significantly deteriorate the HMS performance. These results provide fundamental physical insight into the working mechanism of passive lossless Huygens metasurfaces in general, revealing a new degree of freedom which enables control of the transmitted field amplitude: the virtual region wave impedance. Importantly, the implied broad acceptance angle of the HMS may be harnessed for synthesis of low-profile multifunctional devices, designed to respond to several excitations with reduced reflections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it