MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316759656 · doi:10.2118/174475-ms

Determination of Two-Phase and Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities in Heavy Oil/Water/Gas Systems

2015· article· en· W2316759656 on OpenAlexafffundabout
J. Modaresghazani, R.G. Moore, S. A. Mehta, K.C.. C. van Fraassen

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsRelative permeabilityOil sandsAsphaltDistilled waterPetroleum engineeringPressure dropPhase (matter)Permeability (electromagnetism)Isothermal processTwo-phase flowCore (optical fiber)Three-phaseMaterials scienceGeologyEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialChemistryFlow (mathematics)ChromatographyPorosityMechanicsThermodynamicsMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An experimental study was conducted to investigate the relative permeability behaviour of a typical Canadian bitumen, water and gas. Series of isothermal core flood experiments were conducted on an unconsolidated core composed of cleaned Athabasca sand matrix and relative permeabilities of the involved phases were determined. Athabasca bitumen was used as the oil phase and distilled water and nitrogen were used as water phase and gas phase respectively. A vertical sand-pack core-holder of 1.5 inch diameter and 2 feet long was designed and fabricated to perform sequential injection of oil, gas and water at reservoir temperature and pressure, while collecting information on pressure drop across the core and fluid volumes. The history match technique was used to determine relative permeabilities for two-phase and three-phase water/oil/gas systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical ConferenceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207