“—wie ihn uns Meister Dürer gemalt!”: Contest, Myth, and Prophecy in Wagner's Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Wagner introduced into the very first scene of his opera Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg a brief description of an image of David slaying Goliath. He attributed the image to Albrecht Dürer. But did Dürer actually produce this image? To answer the question, this essay assumes the form of a “had I but known” mystery story to explore the mythological and theological foundations of Wagner's opera of contest, myth, and prophecy. The quest for Dürer's image is set against three contests: between Apollo and Marsyas; between the arts of music, poetry, and painting; and between composers, painters, and poets. The essay draws upon these contests to make explicit the unfolding of a drama that begins with an image in which the old King David of the harp is displaced by a young King David of the sword. The question is: who exactly is the young David?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".