Comparison of Physico-Chemical and Antimicrobial Properties of Surface Treated Textile Materials with Silver, Copper and Bismuth Compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physico-chemical and antimicrobial properties of composite materials comprising a gauze coated with silver, Ag7O8NO3 (silver oxysalt), copper, or bismuth oxides were investigated. For this purpose, nylon substrates were coated with metallic silver or metallic copper using the electroless deposition procedures. Coating of nylon gauze with BiOCl was performed using BiCl3 as a source of bismuth ions. Additionally, silver or copper coated nylon substrates were treated with complexed K[BiI4] solutions. Simple bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities of produced composite materials were also investigated. All samples containing oxidized silver or copper species in a combination with bismuth exhibited both bactericidal and bacteriostatic activities. BiOCl coated nylon substrates exhibited some bactericidal activity against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, but notably, the results of the present showed that the presence of bismuth only was not sufficient for an acceptable antimicrobial activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".