Effects of Short-term Chlorella Supplementation on Fatigue Recovery after Exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the metabolic deterioration and joint problems in retired elite female basketball players. In order to determine the associations between metabolic deterioration and joint health status, 19 retired and 12 current elite female basketball players were recruited for this study. After an overnight fasting, we performed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for all participants, and measured their fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. The joint health status of hip and knee in both current and retired basketball players were determined by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) joint health questionnaire. Results showed that retired players have significantly greater body mass index (BMI), glucose area under the curve (GAUC), fasting blood glucose, hs-CRP and HbA1c levels, along with higher WOMAC joint function aspect scores compared to current players. Moreover, WOMAC joint stiffness was positively associated with fasting blood glucose level. However, the WOMAC overall score and individual aspects showed no association with serum hs-CRP levels. We conclude that retired female basketball players with impaired glycemic control, hyperglycemia and obesity were associated with declined joint health status. Our results therefore suggest that metabolic deterioration in retired female basketball players may be associated with impairments in joint health and functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".