MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316884320 · doi:10.1061/41130(369)103

Performance of Toe-Nail Connections under Realistic Wind Loading

2010· article· en· W2316884320 on OpenAlexaffabout
Murray J. Morrison, Gregory A. Kopp

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2010 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTree Root and Stability Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNail (fastener)Structural engineeringWind engineeringReduction (mathematics)ActuatorFrame (networking)Environmental scienceEngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the pressure loading actuators (PLA) at the University of Western Ontario, ramp and actual wind loads are applied to toe-nail connections for wood-frame residential construction. The ultimate capacity from the ramp and actual wind load tests are similar to those found in the literature. However, under realistic wind loading, the toe-nail connections are found to fail in increments with only the intermittently occurring peak pressures causing the majority of the damage to the connection. In addition, the effects of construction defects, in this case missing nails, were also examined in order to determine the reduction in capacity caused by these.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructures Congress 2010Same topicTree Root and Stability StudiesFrench-language works237,207