Propeller Slipstream Model for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Propeller slipstream, or propwash, can significantly affect the aerodynamic characteristics of propeller driven aircraft by providing additional airflow over their aerodynamic and control surfaces. It is therefore essential to have a good knowledge of the induced velocity within the propeller slipstream to determine the aerodynamic forces and moments on slipstream-immersed components. Existing slipstream models based on simple momentum and lifting line theory have limited application since they consider only the acceleration of air within the slipstream and do not take into account the diffusion phenomenon. As such, they yield good results near the propeller where acceleration is dominant but fail to predict induced velocity accurately far behind the propeller where diffusion dominates. This paper presents a slipstream model that takes into account both the acceleration and diffusion phenomena via simple analytical and semi-empirical equations to predict induced velocity accurately up to ~ 8 - 10 propeller diameters downstream of the propeller plane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".