MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2316927197 · doi:10.5558/tfc2013-048

I'Université Laval; Algonquin College

2013· article· fr· W2316927197 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Xavier Gervais-Gosselin, Sylvie Carles, Katharine van der Jagt, Melissa Meneghetti

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Forestry Chronicle · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Salon de la forêt 2013 -« Le peuple lié à sa forêt »' est sous le thème « Le peuple lié à sa forêt » que les étudiants de foresterie de l'Université Laval ont organisé le 34 e Salon de la forêt au Centre de Foires Expo Cité à Québec les 18, 19 et 20 janvier.Le lancement officiel a eu lieu le vendredi 18 janvier en présence de M. Robert Beauregard, Doyen de la Faculté de foresterie, de géographie et de géomatique de l'Université Laval, ainsi que de M. Mario Gibeault, Directeur général du bureau de la mise en marché du bois.Le Salon de la forêt vise à faciliter le contact entre le milieu forestier et le grand public.Une quarantaine d' exposants de tous les secteurs forestiers étaient sur place.Notons le retour de plusieurs activités vedettes comme les démonstrations de débardage à cheval ou encore le baptême de grimpe, qui simule le travail d'un d' élagueur.Des nouveautés ont aussi su plaire aux habitués du salon, notamment un simulateur d'abattage.Pour son édition 2013, le Salon de la forêt a ciblé les petits propriétaires

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4140.065

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Forestry Chronicle→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→