Analysis of the Electrophysiologic Effects of Short-Term Oxybutynin on Guinea Pig and Rabbit Ventricular Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the cardioactive properties of oxybutynin, a drug that is widely prescribed for management of voiding dysfunction. Membrane currents were recorded from whole-cell-configured guinea pig ventricular myocytes, and action potentials were recorded from guinea pig and rabbit papillary muscles. L-type Ca2+ current (I(Ca),L), inward-rectifier K+ current (I(K1)), and delayed-rectifier K+ current (I(K)) were unaffected by < or = 1 microM oxybutynin, and inhibited by higher concentrations. The concentrations that reduced the currents to one-half of predrug control amplitude (K0.5) were as follows: 1(Ca),L, 16.1 microM, I(K1), 18.2 microM, rapidly activating I(K)(I(Kr)), 11.4 microM, and slowly activating I(K)(I(Ks)), 28.7 microM. Action-potential durations at 20 and 90% repolarization (APD20, APD90) were unaffected by oxybutynin < or =3 microM in guinea pig papillary muscles driven at 1 Hz; higher concentrations selectively shortened the APD20 by as much as 25% (100 microM), and caused moderate reductions in maximal upstroke velocity. Changes in the action potentials of rabbit papillary muscles were even smaller than in the guinea pig muscles. Because the peak therapeutic plasma concentration of oxybutynin is in the 0.01-0.1 microM range, the results suggest that the drug is highly unlikely to have adverse effects on cardiac electrical activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".