MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316948813 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2012-0327

Impact of hypoxia on the metabolism of Greenland halibut (<i>Reinhardtius hippoglossoides</i>)

2013· article· en· W2316948813 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Aurélie Dupont‐Prinet, Marie Vagner, Denis Chabot, Céline Audet

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHalibutHypoxia (environmental)BiologyEstuaryEcologyOxygenFisheryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides), especially juveniles, are frequently found in severely hypoxic areas (18%–25% saturation) of the St. Lawrence Estuary. We investigated the tolerance of this species to hypoxia and evaluated the consequences of low oxygen levels on metabolic capacity. At 5 °C, juveniles had a higher critical oxygen threshold than adults (15% versus 11% saturation), indicating that they were less tolerant to hypoxia. Severe hypoxia (19% saturation) did not affect the juveniles' standard metabolic rate but significantly reduced (by 55%) their maximum metabolic rate compared with normoxia. Consequently, the aerobic scope was reduced by 72% in hypoxia compared with normoxia. In juveniles, severe hypoxia increased the duration of digestive processes. The decrease in aerobic scope in hypoxia and the determination of critical oxygen threshold at a saturation level close to actual field dissolved oxygen values strongly suggest that juveniles from the St. Lawrence Estuary are living at the edge of their metabolic capacity. Consequently, the growth and distribution of Greenland halibut could be affected if there are further declines in dissolved oxygen availability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207