MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316967278 · doi:10.1215/00141801-1435639

One of the Family: Metis Culture in Nineteenth-Century Saskatchewan

2012· article· en· W2316967278 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melinda Marie Jetté

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnohistory · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisIconCitationHistorySpecial collectionsDownloadIndex (typography)Library scienceGenealogyWorld Wide WebComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| January 01 2012 One of the Family: Metis Culture in Nineteenth-Century Saskatchewan One of the Family: Metis Culture in Nineteenth-Century Saskatchewan. By Macdougall, Brenda. (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press and University of Washington Press, 2010. xxii + 335 pp., introduction, illustrations, bibliography, index. $37.95 paper.) Melinda Marie Jetté Melinda Marie Jetté Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Ethnohistory (2012) 59 (1): 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-1435639 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Melinda Marie Jetté; One of the Family: Metis Culture in Nineteenth-Century Saskatchewan. Ethnohistory 1 January 2012; 59 (1): 179–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-1435639 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsEthnohistory Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright 2012 by American Society for Ethnohistory2012 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnohistorySame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207