MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316967747 · doi:10.3354/meps10945

Seabird diet changes in northern Hudson Bay, 1981-2013, reflect the availability of schooling prey

2014· article· en· W2316967747 on OpenAlexaffabout
A. J. Gaston, KH Elliott

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeabirdBayArcticCapelinPredationClimate changeEcologyEcosystemApex predatorForagingMarine ecosystemBiologySea iceFisheryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ongoing climate change is altering Arctic marine ecosystems with major consequences for food-webs. Seabirds, by foraging over large marine areas but returning regularly to their breeding colonies, provide a good medium for tracking such changes. We studied the prey delivered to nestling thick-billed murres Uria lomvia at a colony in northern Hudson Bay, Canada, over the period 1981-2013. During that period, ice conditions in the region altered substantially, with earlier break-up and clearance. This change was not gradual but mainly occurred in the mid-1990s. Breeding chronology also advanced, but not as fast as early summer ice clearance advanced. Ice conditions strongly affected diet, presumably reflecting the change in the timing of breeding relative to ice clearance. Of the dominant species in the diet, the proportion of Arctic cod Boreogadus saida decreased and the proportion of capelin Mallotus villosus increased over the 33 yr period, even after ice effects were taken into account, suggesting a progressive and cumulative effect of environmental change on the marine community. Those cumulative changes were manifested primarily in the diet representation of the most frequent taxa (cod and capelin), with variation in secondary diet components being driven by the availability of the dominant taxa. Diet diversity, representing an increase in the proportion of benthic fish (stichaeids, zoarcids, pholids and sculpins) and invertebrates (squid, amphipods and crustaceans), increased when ice cover was low, and hatching was late relative to ice break-up. Chick growth rates were low when the proportion of benthic fish was high. Hence, although it appears that growth rates are influenced by diet composition, it is more likely that they reflect the availability of the dominant schooling prey species, rather than any nutritional deficiency in benthic species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207