EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON REMOVAL OF UNBURNT CARBON IN FLY ASH BY FLOTATION METHOD AND PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE WITH THE FLY ASH SLURRY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we developed the device to remove unburnt carbon from fly ash that applied flotation method, and experimentally examined the operating condition of the device. After we scaled up to the full scale device, we experimentally examined strength properties of concrete with fly ash removed unburnt carbon by it. According to the results, it was effectively able to removed unburnt carbon from fly ash by the device that installed micro bubble nozzles and a whirl type pump. The removal efficiency of unburnt carbon improved when prior forced stirring was carried out by a concrete mixer for 30 minutes, and scavenger in fly ash slurry of about 60 wt% in the density was added to. The compressive strength of concrete with fly ash slurry that removed unburnt carbon by the full scale device showed a tendency similar to the concrete with fly ash as specified in JIS A 6201 class II.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".