MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316988892 · doi:10.1144/m38.7

Chapter 7 Biogeography of the Ordovician and Silurian Stromatoporoidea

2013· article· en· W2316988892 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heldur Nestor, B. D. Webby

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Memoirs · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrdovicianBiogeographyPaleontologyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Stromatoporoid sponges first appeared during the late Mid-Ordovician (mid–late Darriwilian) accompanying an important ‘Chazy’ reef-building episode. Representatives of the order Labechiida appeared first, initially splitting into two sister groups: those from North China (nine genera) and those from Laurentia (four genera). Two genera were common to the two regions, but others in North China and Siberia were endemic. This initial provincialism was not maintained into the Late Ordovician (Sandbian) as labechiids attained a wider dispersal, covering Laurentia with peripheral terranes in Northwest Scotland and Chukchi Peninsula, cratonic Siberia, the Urals (eastern margins of Baltica), and East Gondwanan blocks of Tarim North China, marginal Tasmania and the peri-Gondwanan New South Wales island-arc terrane. Only a few endemics remained present in the Sandbian – three in Laurentia, and one in Tarim. In the Katian, maximum diversification of labechiids occurred (19 genera, including a genus possibly transitional to first actinostromatids). Also four genera of the Clathrodictyida first appeared, and overall distribution continued to increase. The Hirnantian marked a dramatic decline in the global distribution (only Anticosti Island, Manitoba, Norway and Estonia) and marked diversity loss of labechiids. Altogether c. 70% of stromatoporoid species disappeared in response to end-Ordovician global cooling events. Llandovery stromatoporoids were widespread in Laurentia, Baltica and Siberia, with clathrodictyids as dominant and labechiids accessory (the latter group more common in Siberia and China). Gradual diversification and expansion of stromatoporoids followed in the late Llandovery, with appearances of the orders Actinostromatida and Stromatoporida. The stromatoporoids became most widespread and most diversified during the Wenlock, with clathrodictyids maintaining their leading position, and the appearances of the earliest Stromatoporellida and Syringostromatida. Rapid spread of new phylogenetic stocks indicates that widespread pandemism prevailed among Wenlock stromatoporoids. The Ludlow was characterized by final closure of the Iapetus Ocean, accompanying uplift of palaeocontinental regions, and declining prominence of stromatoporoid-bearing shallow carbonate shelves. However, clathrodictyids and actinostromatids remained dominant, whereas the incoming of Amphiporida in several regions (Somerset Island, Baltic area, West Ukraine, West and East Urals, Novaya Zemlya, Tien Shan, Japan and New South Wales) and restricted distribution of some other taxa suggest a certain provincialism developed. With regional regression and stratigraphic hiatuses, the stromatoporoids (mostly hangovers from the Ludlow) became less common in the Pridoli, and apparently even entirely absent from Gondwana and Siberia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London MemoirsSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207