'Projet Epervier': Design, Build and Flight Test of a Full-Scale Aerobatic Aircraft at the Universite de Sherbrooke
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Universite de Sherbrooke in Canada requires the completion of a large scale design project by the end of the undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering. However, the scope and the scale of the projects at Sherbrooke differ significantly compared to those achieved in most US aerospace schools. Over a period of about two years, teams must go through the complete design process from the project definition to the manufacturing and testing of the system. Not only they must complete the project on time, the students also have the responsibility to gather the funding and develop their own sponsorship program. This paper describes the main characteristics of this unique program that allows large scale projects to be completed with success, such as the “Projet Epervier”. Between 2006 and 2008, a group of 12 undergraduate students in mechanical engineering invested over 12,000 hours to design, manufacture, and flight test a 750 lbs, one-seater, fully aerobatic aircraft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it