MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317068582 · doi:10.4133/sageep2013-169.1

2-D COOPERATIVE CROSS-HOLE ERT AND FULL-WAVEFORM GPR INVERSION

2013· article· en· W2317068582 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2013 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaxima and minimaGround-penetrating radarInverse problemNonlinear systemAlgorithmComputer scienceNorm (philosophy)Inversion (geology)WaveletMathematical optimizationWaveformApplied mathematicsPhysicsGeologyMathematicsMathematical analysisTelecommunicationsRadarArtificial intelligenceSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Full-waveform inversion (FWI) of cross-hole ground penetrating data allows a better resolution in comparison to ray-based tomography. The inverse problem is solved using local optimization algorithms that can converge to local minimum depending on the selection of starting model, nonlinearity of the problem, lack of low frequencies, presence of noise, and approximate modeling of the wave-physics complexity. In this work, multiscale FWI strategy is combined cooperatively with electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) to mitigate the nonlinearity and ill-posedness of FWI, and to improve the ERT resolution. In the FWI, the gradient of the misfit function is generally dominated by the high frequencies. This behavior can potentially be the cause of convergence into local minima, as the determination of the high frequencies depends in turn on the accuracy of the low frequencies. The proposed multiscale FWI reduces the number of model parameters and yields low frequencies in the model space using a regularization method that consists of imposing an L1-norm penalty in the wavelet domain. The minimization of the L1-norm penalty is carried out using an accelerated iterative soft thresholding algorithm. As wavelet transforms provide estimates of the local frequency content of the conductivity or permittivity images, the thresholds are used to control the frequency content in the model space. Generally, a high threshold value is chosen for the 20th first iterations in order to enhance the update of the low frequencies. Then the soft thresholding step tries to find the best thresholds to maximize the structural similarities between conductivity and permittivity images. The initial velocity model for FWI is built from first-arrival traveltime tomography, whereas the ERT current inversion model is used as FWI conductivity starting model. The conductivity model resulting from FWI is then introduced as reference model in ERT inverse problem using hierarchical Bayesian approach. To validate our methodology and its implementation, two synthetic models were created. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach improves the spatial resolution and convergence properties in comparison to classical FWI. This work is an extension to full-waveform inversion of a previously published work (Bouchedda et al., 2012).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it