Inhibition of apoptosis by 60% oxygen: a novel pathway contributing to lung injury in neonatal rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During early postnatal alveolar formation, the lung tissue of rat pups undergoes a physiological remodeling involving apoptosis of distal lung cells. Exposure of neonatal rats to severe hyperoxia (≥95% O(2)) both arrests lung growth and results in increased lung cell apoptosis. In contrast, exposure to moderate hyperoxia (60% O(2)) for 14 days does not completely arrest lung cell proliferation and is associated with parenchymal thickening. On the basis of similarities in lung architecture observed following either exposure to 60% O(2), or pharmacological inhibition of physiological apoptosis, we hypothesized that exposure to 60% O(2) would result in an inhibition of physiological lung cell apoptosis. Consistent with this hypothesis, we observed that the parenchymal thickening induced by exposure to 60% O(2) was associated with decreased numbers of apoptotic cells, increased expressions of the antiapoptotic regulator Bcl-xL, and the putative antiapoptotic protein survivin, and decreased expressions of the proapoptotic cleaved caspases-3 and -7. In summary, exposure of the neonatal rat lung to moderate hyperoxia results in an inhibition of physiological apoptosis, which contributes to the parenchymal thickening observed in the resultant lung injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".