MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ischemia-Induced Action Potential Shortening is Blunted by d-Sotalol in a Pig Model of Reversible Myocardial Ischemia

2000· article· en· W2317148558 on OpenAlexaff
Gilles O’Hara, Sylvain Planté, François Philippon, M. R. Gilbert, Jacques Turgeon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIschemiaMedicineSotalolCardiologyEffective refractory periodInternal medicineAnesthesiaHemodynamicsRefractory period

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to investigate, in an anesthetized pig model of low-flow myocardial ischemia, the electrophysiologic effects of the class III drug d-sotalol during myocardial ischemia. Serial monophasic action potential (MAPD90) recordings and refractory period determinations from the anterior and posterior left ventricular wall were taken in 25 pigs during baseline, after low-flow posterior wall ischemia, after d-sotalol infusion under nonischemic conditions, and after repeated posterior wall ischemia while continuing the drug. Measurements were done at 60 and 150 beats/min after radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular conduction. At baseline, MAPD90 and refractory periods were comparable in the anterior and posterior wall (323 +/- 15 vs. 318 +/- 10 ms, and 267 +/- 10 vs. 262 +/- 11 ms at 60 beats/min, respectively). In the absence of d-sotalol, low-flow regional ischemia was associated with a significant shortening of MAPD90 in the posterior versus the anterior wall (267 +/- 20 vs. 317 +/- 20 ms at 60 beats/min; p = 0.006). Similarly, ischemia-induced shortening of the refractory periods in the posterior wall was apparent (230 +/- 16 ms in the posterior wall vs. 274 +/- 14 ms in the anterior wall at 60 beats/min). In contrast, ischemia was no longer associated with shortening of MAPD90 (360 +/- 17 ms posterior wall and 360 +/- 20 ms anterior wall at 60 beats/min) and refractory periods (304 +/- 19 ms posterior wall vs. 316 +/- 15 ms anterior wall at 60 beats/min) during combined posterior wall ischemia and d-sotalol infusion. Similar findings were obtained during pacing at 150 beats/min. d-Sotalol attenuates ischemia-induced action potential shortening. This property should decrease dispersion of cardiac repolarization and be antiarrhythmic. On the other hand, longer APD under ischemic conditions may favor calcium overload, which may trigger new arrhythmias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular PharmacologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207