MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317152369 · doi:10.2514/6.2010-2926

Hopf Bifurcation Scenario of a Stochastic Aeroelastic Model with Cubic Nonlinearities

2010· article· en· W2317152369 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAeroelasticityHopf bifurcationBifurcationControl theory (sociology)Biological applications of bifurcation theoryApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematicsNonlinear systemPhysicsAerodynamicsMechanicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a numerical study of the stochastic Hopf bifurcation of a two-degree-of-freedom noisy aeroelastic system oscillating in pitch and plunge, with a cubic non-linearity in pitch. We consider a mathematical model expressed by a non-linear system of Stratonovich stochastic differential equations. A random dynamical system is associated with this stochastic model, and in this setup a dynamical approach is used to characterize stochastic bifurcation. We use numerical algorithms to estimate the support of the invariant measures and to calculate the Lyapunov exponents. The stochastic Hopf bifurcation corresponds to a change of stability of invariant measures and the occurrence of new invariant measures for the random dynamical system. A stochastic analysis in this case is useful for validating the mathematical model associated with the aeroelastic system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it