MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2317213404 · doi:10.1177/002070201206700122

Review: The North American Idea <i>A Vision of a Continental Future</i>

2012· article· en· W2317213404 on OpenAlexaffabout
Greg Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)Subject (documents)Political scienceAdministration (probate law)LawSociologyManagementHistoryLibrary scienceArt historyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE NORTH AMERICAN IDEA A Vision of A Continental Future Robert A. Pastor New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. 288pp, US$24.g5 (doth). ISBN 978-0199782413In June 2001, two Roberts met at the office of the United States trade representative in Washington, DC. One was President George W. Bush's new hard-charging, internationalist United States trade representative, Robert Zoellick, now president of the World Bank. The other was Robert Pastor of Emory University, himself no shrinking violet in intellectual combat. It seemed an auspicious time for such a meeting. At Zoellick's initiative, the Bush administration was poised to breathe new life into a US trade agenda that had stalled since the completion of NAFTA and GATT's Uruguay round in 1994. Pastor was one of the best-known scholars on North American integration and had just completed a new manuscript on the topic. After a discussion with Zoellick and his staff about the American trade agenda, including the pursuit of fast-track authority on which subject Pastor remains the expert), the two Roberts parted ways.At the time of the meeting, I was a doctoral student and intern in the trade representative's office of the Americas, working mainly on North American issues. In early July, a draft manuscript of Pastor's book made its way to my office. Zoellick had requested that someone read it and prepare a summary. The job was quickly delegated to me.The staff seized this opportunity to keep their intern busy for several days. In Toward a North American Community: Lessons from the Old World for the New (2001), Pastor argued that the US could learn many important lessons - many of them negative - from European economic integration. The postwarimperatives ofrecovery and security had initially driven Europe's experiment, which subsequently became a victim of its own success. Over time, sclerotic decision-making within the EU's supranational structures came to overwhelm the benefits of trade liberalization, labour mobility, and a common currency.By contrast, NAFTA left North America incomplete. The agreement had stimulated enormous economic activity and deepened ties among the United States, Canada, and Mexico. But the continent's potential remained unrealized because no governance structures had been established to manage it. Over-governance in Europe undermined competitiveness, but under-governance in North America generated a paralysis of its own. Pastor's book both explained how North America had evolved and prophesied what it could become. Even as it warned of the dangers of EU-style governance, it also charted possible paths toward greater trilateral cooperation, culminating in a customs or monetary union.Although Pastor acknowledged that these efforts would have a uniquely North American flavour rooted in the history and culture of each nation, he quickly attracted withering criticism from nationalist critics in all three countries, including both television pundits such as CNN's Lou Dobbs and antiglobalization street protestors. Given that the antiglobalization movement reached its zenith in 2001, Toward a North American Community had trouble attracting widespread support.His latest book, The North American Idea, offers a vision of what North America could be. It offers concrete proposals and impassioned advocacy in abundance. The North American prescription did not change significantly over the decade that elapsed between this book and its predecessor. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis→Same topicInternational Relations in Latin America→French-language works237,207→