MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317268562 · doi:10.1021/la2023693

Mechanism of YF<sub>3</sub> Nanoparticle Formation in Reverse Micelles

2011· article· en· W2317268562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicelleNanoparticleMechanism (biology)ChemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringNanotechnologyCrystallographyChemical physicsPhysical chemistryPhysicsAqueous solution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article reports an investigation of the mechanism of YF(3) nanoparticle formation in two variants of the reverse microemulsion precipitation method. These two variants involve the addition of F(-), either as a microemulsion or directly as an aqueous solution, to Y(3+) dispersed in nonionic reverse micelles. The two methods yield amorphous and single-crystal nanoparticles, respectively. The kinetics of reagent mixing are studied by (19)F NMR and colorimetric model reactions, and the particle growth is monitored by TEM. Mixing and nucleation are shown to occur within seconds to minutes whereas particle growth continues for 4 to 48 h, depending on the particle type. Moreover, the growth rate remains constant during most of the growth period, indicating that Ostwald ripening is the most probable growth mechanism. The single-emulsion method also produces a minority amorphous population that exhibits significantly different growth kinetics, attributed to a coagulation mechanism. Secondary growth experiments, involving the addition of precursor ions to mature particles, have been conducted to evaluate the relative importance of nucleation and the competitive growth of existing particle populations. The key differences between the two methods reside in the nucleation step. In the case of the classical method, nucleation occurs upon intermicellar collisions and under conditions of comparable concentrations of Y(3+) and F(-). This method generates more numerous stable nuclei and smaller particles. In the single-microemulsion method, nucleation occurs in the presence of excess F(-) through the interaction of Y(3+)-containing micelles with microdroplets of aqueous F(-). These conditions lead to the formation of crystalline particles and a wider size distribution of unstable nuclei.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it