MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317292009 · doi:10.1097/rct.0000000000000196

Computed Tomography Appearance of Normal Nonossified Thyroid Cartilage

2015· article· en· W2317292009 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOropharyngeal Anatomy and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComputed tomographyTomographyThyroidThyroid cartilageCartilageRadiologyNuclear medicineAnatomyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the density and homogeneity of the nonossified thyroid cartilage (NOTC) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) providing preliminary information for future evaluation of cartilage invasion using dual-energy CT. METHODS: One hundred normal-larynx CT scans were evaluated for the density and homogeneity of NOTC. RESULTS: The density of the NOTC was homogeneous in all cases. Nonossified thyroid cartilage had higher mean density than contiguous muscle, but there was overlap. In 47 cases, a lucent area was observed at the junction of the ossified and NOTC but not within the NOTC itself. In 11 cases, ossification was observed in only 1 cortex of the thyroid cartilage. Cartilage at the anterior commissure was not ossified in 7 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Nonossified thyroid cartilage has a homogeneous appearance on contrast-enhanced CT scans, but showed some normal variations that could be mistakenly reported as tumor invasion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it