MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317293149 · doi:10.1190/ice2015-2209988

3-D Mapping and Correlation of Intraformational Seals Within the Latrobe Group in the Nearshore Gippsland Basin

2015· article· en· W2317293149 on OpenAlexaff
Nick Hoffman, T.R. Evans, Natt Arian

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne, Australia 13-16 September 2015 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCarbon Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGroup (periodic table)Structural basinGeochemistryGeomorphologyOceanographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During its assessment of the nearshore Gippsland Basin (within 25 km of the coastline), the CarbonNet project has identified interbedded coals and shales of the Middle Eocene Lower N. asperus Zone as the key seal for upper Halibut reservoirs. This interval corresponds to the (Bartonian) T2 basal zone of the coal seams within the onshore coal-bearing Traralgon Formation which is widespread within the nearshore region of the Gippsland Basin. Previous hydrocarbon exploration shows that the T2 sequence is the intraformational topseal to several intra-Latrobe oil accumulations in the nearshore area, and that distinct pressure and salinity differences exist across this aquitard. Hence, the T2 represents a sub-regional seal, and is shown to be one of a set of backstepping subregional seals throughout the Bass Strait petroleum province. This family of seals offers additional trapping opportunities for future oil exploration in the offshore Gippsland Basin. A detailed correlation between nearshore and onshore wells has been carried out using existing well and 3D seismic data to define 3D geometry and continuity of the T2 units. The onshore Traralgon Formation ties to the offshore Burong Formation in the Barracouta gas field and small oilfields in the nearshore western Gippsland Basin. Seismic attribute extracts are presented as maps of coal quality and facies demonstrating the aspect ratio and lateral extent of coal depocentres, as well as details of the fluvial inputs, channel geometries, and clastic depocentres. Seal capacity of these intraformational seals is defined as a minimum by the observed hydrocarbon columns but also by MICP data which suggests seal potential well in excess of the proven columns. The critical constraints on trap capacity appear to be fault-related, and depend on the time scale. For petroleum, where multi-million year trapping is required in order for oil to be still present today, very efficient trapping is required with essentially no fault transmissibility. For CO2 storage over many thousands of years, slow seepage through faults and offset baffles may be acceptable, especially where it leads to additional dissolution into the active aquifer which is sweeping fluids from onshore to offshoreCorrelation of the T2 sequence and the definition of fairways where there is suitable seal potential is crucial to assess CO2 storage potential and intraformational hydrocarbon trapping over the next 50 years of Gippsland Basin activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne, Australia 13-16 September 2015Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207