On the Size Distribution of Self-Associated Asphaltenes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A variety of experimental techniques were applied to a single source asphaltene sample at the same experimental conditions in order to reveal the possible size distributions of asphaltene monomers and aggregates. The asphaltene sample was divided into solubility cuts by selective precipitation in solutions of heptane and toluene. Asphaltene self-association was assessed through a combination of density, vapor pressure osmometry (VPO), elemental analysis, Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometry, and time-resolved fluorescence emission spectra measurements performed on each cut. The physical dimensions of the asphaltenes were assessed using SAXS, DLS, membrane diffusion, Rayleigh scattering, and nanofiltration measurements. Molecular and nanoaggregate dimensions were also investigated through a combination of interfacial tension, interfacial adsorption, and surface force measurements. All of the measurements indicated that approximately 90 wt % of the asphaltenes self-associated. Ultrahigh resolution spectrometry suggests that the nonassociated asphaltenes are smaller and more aromatic than bulk asphaltenes indicating that the associating species are larger and less aromatic. On the basis of VPO, the average monomer molecular weight was approximately 850 g/mol, while the molecular weight of the nanoaggregates spanned a range of at least 30000 g/mol with an average on the order of 10000 to 20000 g/mol. SAXS and DLS gave molecular weights 10 times larger. The physical dimensions of the nanoaggregates were less than 20 nm based on nanofiltration and with average diameters of 5 to 9 nm based on diffusion and Rayleigh scattering. SAXS and DLS gave average diameters of 14 nm and indicated that the nanoaggregates had loose structures. Film studies were consistent with the lower molecular weights and dimensions and also demonstrated that asphaltene monolayers swell by a factor of 4 in the presence of a solvent. The most consistent interpretation of the data is that asphaltenes form a highly polydisperse distribution of loosely structured (porous or low fractal dimension) nanoaggregates. However, the discrepancy between VPO and SAXS molecular weights remains unresolved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".