MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317311317 · doi:10.1021/ef400729w

On the Size Distribution of Self-Associated Asphaltenes

2013· article· en· W2317311317 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneSmall-angle X-ray scatteringChemistryVapor pressure osmometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)HeptaneDynamic light scatteringScatteringChemical engineeringChromatographyVapor pressureOrganic chemistryNanoparticle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A variety of experimental techniques were applied to a single source asphaltene sample at the same experimental conditions in order to reveal the possible size distributions of asphaltene monomers and aggregates. The asphaltene sample was divided into solubility cuts by selective precipitation in solutions of heptane and toluene. Asphaltene self-association was assessed through a combination of density, vapor pressure osmometry (VPO), elemental analysis, Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometry, and time-resolved fluorescence emission spectra measurements performed on each cut. The physical dimensions of the asphaltenes were assessed using SAXS, DLS, membrane diffusion, Rayleigh scattering, and nanofiltration measurements. Molecular and nanoaggregate dimensions were also investigated through a combination of interfacial tension, interfacial adsorption, and surface force measurements. All of the measurements indicated that approximately 90 wt % of the asphaltenes self-associated. Ultrahigh resolution spectrometry suggests that the nonassociated asphaltenes are smaller and more aromatic than bulk asphaltenes indicating that the associating species are larger and less aromatic. On the basis of VPO, the average monomer molecular weight was approximately 850 g/mol, while the molecular weight of the nanoaggregates spanned a range of at least 30000 g/mol with an average on the order of 10000 to 20000 g/mol. SAXS and DLS gave molecular weights 10 times larger. The physical dimensions of the nanoaggregates were less than 20 nm based on nanofiltration and with average diameters of 5 to 9 nm based on diffusion and Rayleigh scattering. SAXS and DLS gave average diameters of 14 nm and indicated that the nanoaggregates had loose structures. Film studies were consistent with the lower molecular weights and dimensions and also demonstrated that asphaltene monolayers swell by a factor of 4 in the presence of a solvent. The most consistent interpretation of the data is that asphaltenes form a highly polydisperse distribution of loosely structured (porous or low fractal dimension) nanoaggregates. However, the discrepancy between VPO and SAXS molecular weights remains unresolved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it