MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317323603 · doi:10.1093/fs/kns037

Hergé reporter: Tintin en contexte <i>Hergé reporter: Tintin en contexte</i> . Edited by R <scp>ainier</scp> G <scp>rutman</scp> and M <scp>axime</scp> P <scp>révost</scp> . (Special issue of <i>Études françaises</i> , 46.2). Montreal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 2010. 184 pp. Pb CAD $12.00.

2012· article· fr· W2317323603 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laurence Grove

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArthERGHumanitiesArt historyLibrary scienceMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Hergé reporter: Tintin en contexte Get access Hergé reporter: Tintin en contexte. Edited by Rainier Grutman and Maxime Prévost. (Special issue of Études françaises, 46.2). Montreal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 2010. 184 pp. Pb CAD $12.00. Laurence Grove Laurence Grove University of Glasgow laurence.grove@glasgow.ac.uk Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume 66, Issue 2, April 2012, Pages 266–267, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/kns037 Published: 01 April 2012

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207