MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317333491 · doi:10.3406/bulmo.2002.1095

L'Ostal de l'Ychairie à Puy l'Evêque (Lot)

2002· article· en· W2317333491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin Monumental · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnightTowerArtEleventhHumanitiesInscribed figureMonarchyQuarter (Canadian coin)Character (mathematics)Art historyAncient historyHistoryGenealogyArchaeologyPoliticsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ostal of Ychairie at Puy-1'Evêque. At the gateway to the fourteenth century, a large number of nobles, who were subject to the authority of the Bishop of Cahors, lived in the fortified city of Puy-l'Evêque (department of Lot) . Guiral-Ychier del Pech, a knight of minor lineage whose family is attested since the eleventh century, is thought to have built, on the fringes of noble quarter and the « bourg », an important noble mansion to which he gave his name : l'Ostal de l'Ychayrie. The construction of the dwelling over a cellar and the wide windows, hierarchically arranged and decorated with family portraits, are among the exterior signs of the building's aristocratic character. Another major element of that architectural rhetoric is the great staircase that seems to express the change in relations that is brought about, through the ostal, between the two levels of the fortified city. Usually externalised, in the conventional plan of the palatial great hall or castle court, it is here internalised and inscribed in a monumental arcade. Such an interiorisation seems to prefigure a conception that does not really catch hold until the fifteenth century, namely the lodgings accompanied by a spiral staircase enclosed in a tower.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it