Measured and predicted temperatures in a grain processing building under heat treatment – 1. Temperature profiles during heat treatment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Measured and predicted temperatures in a grain processing building under heat treatment -1. Temperature profiles during heat treatment. Canadian Biosystems Engineering/Le gnie des biosystmes au Canada 54: 3.1-3.8. Heat treatment is an effective method of controlling pest insects in grain processing facilities. Temperatures inside a heat-treated flour-storage building and temperatures of wheat, oats, wheat flour, and oat flour in piles or tubes, 0.15 m high, on a concrete floor inside the building, were measured during a 20-h time period of heat treatment. The room temperature at different locations had the same distribution pattern in the vertical direction despite the presence of circulating fans at different locations of the room. Temperature gradients in the vertical direction decreased with increasing height. The maximum and mean temperature gradients above the surface of the concrete floor, in the absence of grain, were 5.4C/cm and 3.60.0C/cm; respectively. The room temperatures at higher locations varied less than those at lower locations. Moreover, after the surface grain temperature reached 97% of its maximum temperature, it was influenced by the local temperature and periphery configuration. Key words: Heat treatment, grain-processing building, temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it