MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P3.315 Does Adjusting For Sexual Behaviour Improve the Accuracy of Population-Based Chlamydia Incidence and Screening Rates Among Adolescents in British Columbia, Canada?

2013· article· en· W2317366020 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mark Gilbert, Ashley Roberts, Kate Mitchell, Yuko Homma, Curren Warf, L. Daly, Elizabeth Saewyc

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographyMedicineChlamydiaIncidence (geometry)PopulationSexually activePublic healthReproductive healthSexually transmitted diseaseGynecologyEnvironmental healthImmunologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Syphilis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Recent studies using setting-specific health insurance or clinical datasets have demonstrated the importance of considering sexual activity when calculating Chlamydia incidence and screening rates, particularly for adolescents. Using data from a provincial adolescent health survey we assessed the impact of adjusting for sexual activity on population-based Chlamydia incidence and screening rates among adolescents in British Columbia (BC), Canada. <h3>Methods</h3> We estimated the proportion of adolescent males (15–18 years) and females (14–18 years) who had ever had sexual intercourse (i.e., sexually active) using data from a cluster-stratified survey of public school students (Grades 7–12) completed by ∼30,000 BC students in 2003 and 2008. Using provincial Chlamydia surveillance and testing data we compared adolescent Chlamydia screening and incidence rates in BC by age and gender, using total and sexually active populations as denominators. <h3>Results</h3> During these time periods, an estimated 32% and 33% of males 15–18 years and 28% and 31% of females 14–18 years were sexually active in 2003 and 2008 respectively. Regardless of denominator used, screening and incidence rates increased with age, and were higher among females compared to males. Sexually active incidence and screening rates were consistently higher with a more pronounced impact at younger ages. For example, in 2008 screening rates among 14 year old females were 26.2% vs 2.5% in sexually active and total populations respectively, while the corresponding rates among 18 year old females were 60.2% vs 28.9% (2.1 times higher). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Using data representing the entire population of BC adolescents we demonstrated that without adjustment for sexual behaviour, adolescent Chlamydia incidence and screening rates are substantially under-estimated, particularly at younger ages. Adjusting for sexual behaviour using population survey data is essential for accurately monitoring the population impact of prevention and screening programmes among adolescents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207