MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317374166 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00206

Sustainable Synthesis of Magnetic Ruthenium-Coated Iron Nanoparticles and Application in the Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenation of Ketones

2015· article· en· W2317374166 on OpenAlexafffund
Reuben Hudson, Vanessa Chazelle, Mary Bateman, Ranjan Roy, Chao‐Jun Li, Audrey Moores

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCentre in Green Chemistry and Catalysis
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBimetallic stripCatalysisRutheniumTransfer hydrogenationNanoparticleX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyLeaching (pedology)Inductively coupled plasmaSelectivityCopperChemistryMagnetic nanoparticlesPalladiumMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The galvanic reduction of catalytically active metals onto iron/iron oxide core/shell nanoparticles is a rapid, efficient and sustainable method to access new catalysts, already explored with copper and palladium. Herein, we present novel bimetallic ruthenium–iron nanoparticles synthesized by this method. This material constitutes a magnetically recoverable heterogeneous catalyst for transfer hydrogenation with a pronounced selectivity for ketones over aldehydes and nitro groups. The nanoparticles are recyclable up to five times without a significant decrease in activity or leaching, and characterized by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207