MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2317379416 · doi:10.1021/ac401605s

Measurement of the <sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C of Atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> Using Near-Infrared (NIR) Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy

2013· article· en· W2317379416 on OpenAlexaff
Y Chen, Kevin K. Lehmann, J. D. Kessler, Barbara Sherwood Lollar, Georges Lacrampe‐Couloume, T. C. Onstott

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsChemistryCavity ring-down spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)LaserSpectroscopyRing laserInfraredInfrared spectroscopyAbsorption (acoustics)DiodeOpticsOptoelectronicsMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A near-infrared (NIR) continuous-wave-cavity ring-down spectrometry (CW-CRDS) device was developed with the goal of measuring seasonal changes in the isotopic composition of atmospheric CH4 on Earth and eventually on Mars. The system consisted of three distributed feedback laser diodes (DFB-LDs), two of which were tuned to the absorption line peaks of (12)CH4 and (13)CH4 at 6046.954 cm(-1) and 6049.121 cm(-1), respectively, and a third that measured the baseline at 6050.766 cm(-1). The multiple laser design improved the long-term stability of the system and increased the data acquisition rate. The acquisition frequency was further increased by utilizing a semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) to initiate cavity ring-down events. The high repetition rate combined with the superhigh reflectivity mirrors yielded precise isotopic measurements in this NIR region, even though the line strengths of CH4 in this region are 200 times weaker than those of the strongest mid-IR absorption bands. The current system has a detection limit of 1.9 × 10(-12) cm(-1), corresponding to 10 pptv of CH4 at 100 Torr. For ambient air samples that contained 1.9 ppmv CH4, the δ(13)C of the CH4 was determined to be -48.7 ± 1.7‰ (1σ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207